‘After almost destroying our world, our relatives are allies’: the gripping podcast from JFK & Khrushchev’s descendants.

During October 1962, the planet came nearer to destruction than at any other point during the contemporary era. This transpired when a US reconnaissance plane found the fact that Russian atomic weapon sites were under construction in Cuba, less than 160 kilometers from the US mainland. In response, President JFK directed a naval task force to impose a naval blockade encircling the island. The ensuing period was nearly a fortnight filled with extreme anxiety.

An Catastrophic Danger

The threat was palpable. If President Kennedy, or his Soviet counterpart, Nikita Khrushchev, were to fire on their enemy, a chain reaction involving global nuclear strikes and retaliatory strikes might have followed, thrusting mankind into all-out oblivion.

The October crisis has been documented repeatedly, in volumes, films, and television programmes. But, in its latest installment, a prominent BBC World Service podcast titled "The Bomb" presents an unprecedented perspective into this historical narrative. It is jointly hosted by Kennedy's relative alongside Khrushchev's descendant, relatives belonging to the men who, over 13 days, grasped the fate of humanity in their hands.

"What was the Kremlin thinking? What were the United States considering?" ponders Nina Khrushcheva, the Soviet leader's descendant and an academic specializing in international affairs.

In her view, the beauty of the podcast lies in its endeavor to objectively ask: "How can nations detest each other and confront one another?"

"I am acutely aware how spectacular the fact that individuals have the potential to be friends or else have the potential to be complete enemies," remarks Max Kennedy, the son of RFK, related to the late president and currently an author and attorney. "We see this repeatedly when countries have gone to war, demonstrating how unbelievably stupid involved to fight."

A Precipice of Catastrophe

What is striking regarding the Cuban missile crisis was that, since it unfolded in the global spotlight, citizens globally were able to observe almost as it happened as it moved towards disaster. Even so, the danger of annihilation came closer than most people realised.

"Virtually everyone among Kennedy's advisors wanted a military strike and an invasion," explains Max Kennedy. "Had the U.S. struck Cuba using the naval blockade, undoubtedly the Russians stationed there would've fired a tactical nuclear weapon at the American ships, which would have obliterated our naval vessels as well as destroyed our primary naval force. In turn, the U.S. would have retaliated through massive retaliation which would have ended most life on Earth."

The reality it didn’t is a testament to both leaders, who succeeded in exercise restraint and engaging in diplomacy when hawkish elements around them were advocating action. Consequently, The Soviet premier removed the missiles from the Caribbean island while President Kennedy (although not reported then) removed American similar weapons based in Turkey. The relief was palpable, matched by the sense of optimism.

The Different Perspective

Still, for those two weeks of October 1962, the fear was felt globally. The podcast's presenters came into the world in the years following the crisis, with Nina being taught about the crisis through the USSR's school curriculum, which portrayed a slightly different picture of events.

"You said your father recalls it, describing it as a frightening day," Khrushcheva notes. "But for Soviet citizens, the public really didn’t know a great deal regarding the crisis, since it was a tense situation, and under the Soviet system the official line was that things are always wonderful or positive."

Inside the Khrushchev household, however, the perspective was distinct. "They told me what a great moment for the USSR, because it was eyeball to eyeball. They were able to find a solution, and avoided the war, which was a wonderful thing," she adds. In the years to come, though, that interpretation would not be shared by all Russians. "For a long time within Russian historical analysis, the crisis was viewed as a failure for Khrushchev, simply he didn’t blow up the United States."

An Unprecedented Collaboration

The Bomb is so balanced , expertly crafted so much so that Nina quips it almost made her forget she already knew outcome. This is, partly, due to contributions from historians. But, truly, the most momentous aspect remains the involvement of the hosts themselves. Even within living memory, it would be inconceivable for descendants of the leaders of America and the USSR would appear together publicly. The fact that Max Kennedy and Nina Khrushcheva can do that, and exhibit such warmth toward one another, has to be a sign of optimism.

"We aren't the pioneers," notes Nina. "After 1991, a relative moved to America and became great friends with the former president's family."

"However we were strangers before the podcast," clarifies Max. "That is unfortunate because we got along really well and we’re friends, something that is really great. Finally, after almost 60 years since almost destroying the world, our families have become allies, so I think global relations is safer, a little bit."

Contemporary Echoes with Current Dangers

Or is it? One reason why this series feels so necessary is because we now are living in a perilous era. The symbolic clock of doom is closer to catastrophe than ever before, in part because world leaders appear not to have the capacity to grasp

Morgan Robbins
Morgan Robbins

A digital strategist with over a decade of experience in curating premium online resources and tools.