🔗 Share this article

In a historic legal move, San Francisco is set to file what is being called the country's inaugural government lawsuit against major food manufacturers concerning UPFs. The city asserts that municipalities have been bearing the enormous costs of treating diseases linked to the population-wide eating of these manufactured goods.

The Primary Claim of the Case

The city's filing, to be submitted in state court, targets ten large companies responsible for manufacturing some of the America's favorite food and beverage items. This roster reportedly encompasses everything from breaded chicken pieces and frozen pizzas to crisps and sweetened morning cereals. Notably, the case also includes products like some bread varieties and snack bars that are often advertised as "healthy" options.

The lawsuit charges these companies of perpetrating "unfair and deceptive acts" in their promotion and distribution. It states that these practices breach state laws regarding unfair competition and public nuisance. A key assertion is that the corporations knew their products were linked to illness but sold them anyway.

"It makes me sick that families for years are being misled and buying food that's not food," said the city's leading attorney.

Defining UPFs

UPFs are created using factory methods and contain additives not typically found in a domestic kitchen. These include chemical preservatives, taste boosters, synthetic dyes, and binding agents, with minimal intact food content.

Research indicates that more than 70% of the American diet is comprised of foods widely regarded as ultra-processed. Concerningly, kids are estimated to get more than sixty percent of their energy from such foods.

The Proven Health Risks

A massive global study, published recently, found that eating ultra-processed foods is connected to harm in every major organ system of the body. The review associated these foods with an higher likelihood of a numerous major illnesses, encompassing:

• Oncological diseases
• Excessive weight gain
• Type 2 diabetes
• Mental health struggles
• Heart disease
• Brain function deterioration

The researchers of that review concluded that the explosion of UPFs is being fueled by multinational companies, not personal consumer decisions. They described UPFs as a primary driver of a global "chronic disease pandemic" linked to diet, with manufacturers focusing on earnings above all else.

Ideological Convergence on a Rare Issue

This lawsuit marks a unusual instance of concurrence between the politically progressive city of San Francisco and the national leadership. The federal Health and Human Services Secretary has vocally opposed ultra-processed foods, urging Americans to reduce their intake on products with added sugar, salt, unhealthy fats, artificial colors, and chemical preservatives as part of a "Make America Healthy Again" mission.

The city attorney noted that while he parts ways with the administration on other medical subjects, the science on ultra-processed foods is "unquestionable." He commented, "Several the views of this administration are lacking evidence, but this is an exception. As the saying goes is right twice a day."

Named Corporations and Legal Precedent

The corporations listed in the complaint allegedly include major players such as:

• The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo
• Kraft Heinz Company
• General Mills and Kellogg
• Nestlé USA and Mondelez International
• Post Holdings, Mars Incorporated, and ConAgra Brands

This move builds upon other regulatory steps in California. Earlier this year, the state enacted a bipartisan bill that became the first in the U.S. to provide a statutory definition of ultra-processed foods, setting the stage for removing them from schools. The state has also prohibited specific ingredients, including food dyes linked to behavioral difficulties in children, within school meals.

The city attorney's office has a track record in winning cases against large corporations on public health matters, including actions against cigarette manufacturers, paint companies, and pharmaceutical firms.

The lawsuit will seek monetary restitution for the expenses that cities and counties bear for addressing the health of individuals whose conditions have been exacerbated by the dietary reliance of UPFs.